Opinion | How Trump Is Running to Snatch Victory From the Jaws of Defeat, Again – The New York Times

“He could try to change his form of governing. However, given the disadvantage in approval that he currently incurs, the president still has a 31 percent probability of winning the Electoral College. In these runs, he typically obtains the 270 electors needed for victory by carrying at least one of three states: Michigan, Pennsylvania or Florida.

ImagePennsylvania delegates filling out their ballots in 2016 for Donald Trump.
Credit…Charles Mostoller for The New York Times

Unless he chose to alter his style dramatically, the president has to choose between a 20 percent chance of re-election if he seeks a national victory that leads to an electoral victory and a 31 percent probability of re-election if he decides to forget about the national vote and simply focus on the few states that can give him an electoral victory.”

Opinion | How Trump Is Running to Snatch Victory From the Jaws of Defeat, Again – The New York Times

By Vinod Bakthavachalam and 

Mr. Bakthavachalam is a data scientist. Mr. Hundt is the chief executive and co-founder of Making Every Vote Count.

Credit…Charles Mostoller for The New York Times

“Donald Trump commands a remarkable level of support from virtually every elected official in his party and almost all voters likely to vote for his party. In this respect, he stands alone among presidents in modern history. The question arises: Why shouldn’t he try to hold that base, drive his approval rating high above 50 percent and win a big national victory in November 2020?

The answer is that in this century the Electoral College system strongly encourages candidates of both parties, and particularly any Republican candidate, to ignore the national popular vote. That’s especially true for President Trump: The system rewards him for focusing on a handful of states, located mostly in the Great Lakes region, with policies, promises and programs that may not resonate or even be consistent with the interests of all Americans.

To uncover statistical proof of this incentive, our nonprofit Making Every Vote Count built a model of the upcoming election based on the history of voting in previous elections in the modern era. Our conclusion is that even if the general population prefers the Democratic nominee by much more than was the case in 2016, Mr. Trump has almost a one-third chance of winning the Electoral College while ignoring the national vote but only about a one-fifth chance of winning the national popular vote as a route to winning the Electoral College.

With those odds, any rational strategist would tell Mr. Trump to campaign for victory in the swing states that hold the electors necessary to get to magic 270 number, even if the message, the visits and the focus might turn off voters in the rest of the country. This sort of campaign and this type of presidency might not be best for the economy or society as a whole. But it is the way to win.”